December 28, 2007

Two Nouns

It was a bit of an experiment to occupy my mind as it refused to sleep: a pair of quatrains in iambic pentameter (not strictly so, obviously - I'd rather say what I have to say than be a slave to meter) on a pair of images I'd had floating around in my brain during the car ride from my parents' house to Colleen's mother's; one a fantasy (an Alexandrian library abuzz with men reading [aloud] and as such performing books) and the other a familiar reality. I'd written [sic] two perfect quatrains (as perfect goes) in my head, rehearsed them for a few hours (or so it seemed), and eventually went to sleep.

The next day, Christmas, I spent the last leg of a twelve hour car ride with Colleen and her mother to North Dakota tossing about the two quatrains, or at least what I could remember of them.

two nouns

a finest tomb for books and brains on the verge
of calling each other minds in the clear light
of a quiet beam lying still against
[

the old, Alexandrian chatterbox
kicking up dusty clouds of noisome bodies
sweating out[
]silent tongues.

The square bracket thing I stole from Anne Carson (who stole it from editors of classical texts) to represent a lack, specifically what I couldn't remember despite repeating it back to myself off and on for a few hours. Once I finally gave up, I noticed something about the flow of these two quatrains - rather their new flow, the happy result of artifice and chance. I hadn't intended it, but the accidental result of "lying still against... the old, Alexandrian chatterbox" both cements the juxtaposition of these two visions of libraries and elides them. This is how flow is supposed to work, I think it says something about the machinations of my brain that I only stumbled upon it. A more studied example of how I would approach flow came to me as Colleen's Aunt Tracy's cat was busy shedding all over me, and her Uncle Bob waited in the backyard for a buck to come along so he could shoot it in the head.

in minds
entombed
in books
encrypted--
in books
entombed
in bricks
envisioned--
in minds
enslaved
to books
imprinted--
two books
enslaved
to brains
implanted--

I intended this as a round or a series of lines whose "end" could flow grammatically back into the beginning like a verbal Möebius strip. This isn't quite how flow generally works in hip-hop, but it was at least an attempt at a kind of poetry whose embedded sound patterns are a bit more comprehensible than the L-A-N-G-U-A-G-E poets'.

shiawase na goro ni kiiteta ongaku o
pokke ni irete
chikatetsu ni noru

the music I listened to when I was happy
I put in my pocket
and get on the subway

In the past, I've referred to Sato Mayumi's poetry as, well, shallow, perhaps because I didn't exactly get it at first. Unlike, say, Tawara Machi, oft praised for revolutionizing waka diction, who largely adheres to the conventions of classical versification, Mayumi has found a place for lines in a poetic form that has been by and large line-less. More than that, her language is thoroughly mundane, whose lack of profundity I originally took for banality, and seeks to find in the mundane something sublime. By breaking up the single line form she manages to effect a series of semantic turns not unlike what I remember Mike mentioning in relation to the choruses of the Oedipus Tyrannos.

shinu koto no
kimatta hito no
sewa o suru you ni
waratte bakari ita
koi

a love
where you can but smile
as if caring for
someone who's decided
to die

The problem inherent in translating this poem is a matter of the diametrically opposed syntaxes of Japanese and English. Where my translation moves from love to death, Mayumi's moves from death to love: shinu koto no (to die) kimatta hito no (person who's decided) sewa o suru you ni (as if caring for) waratte bakari ita (do nothing but smile) koi (love). Thus the semantic progression becomes, according to the sequence of lines, "to die - a person who's decided to die - as if caring for someone who's decided to die - doing nothing but laugh as if caring for someone who's decided to die" and all that ends up modifying the simple word "love." The move from death to love is synonymous with, in my mind, the emergence of hope, making my move from love to death synonymous with despair. I'd get pretty down about translation, then, if I didn't occasionally remind myself--accidentally--that something is gained, even in loss.

2 Comments:

At 1:29 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

really liked this piece. felt there's a lot to say, but at a loss where to start. a bit jealous of you having the luxury of playing your favorite game. will come back later for more detailed comments. one thing though, while the move from death to love implies hope, moving from love to death feels to me more like melancholy than despair. does melancholy imply hope against hope?

meanwhile, wish you and colleen and everyone a very happy new year.
liansu

 
At 8:25 AM, Blogger Nicholas Theisen said...

Well, I chose despair, because etymologically it means to lose hope or move away from hope. The about-face from one idea to another to another is important here, so likewise I chose despair because it implied a move in the opposite direction. Melancholy feels more like a state to me, and that's certainly not what I was going for.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home