Of Being a Happy Misanthrope
Alceste, a man of near excessive virtue, finds himself falling in love with a woman who embodies all the things he despises in humanity. He even realizes that his love for her is patently absurd but is helpless in overcoming his desire for her. Trite critics have taken this as a sign of the impossible reconciliation of the heart and head; I refuse to believe that characters are billboards for a particular lay philosophical position.
Alceste finds himself beset by the very system of justice (unjustly, mind you) he unreasonably put so much faith in. I won't get into the details, but he decides to impose a kind of self-exile, if only to preserve what little sanity he has left. And the play ends. That's it.
I've also always been disturbed by how Strepsiades goes apeshit at the end of Aristophanes' Clouds, burning down the very Thinkery to which he had sent his son to learn how to get Strepsiades out of his debts. As a result, he estranges his son, in a fashion not unlike my estrangement from my own father exacted by a similarly unnecessary, overvalued collegiate education.
Christmas in Japan has the capacity to turn one into an incredibly cynical human being: they hype every commercial aspect of the holiday to the same excessive degrees Americans do, but the day itself is like any other. People go to work, and the material trappings of Christmas entirely disappear from the face of the country. Without the cathartic release from hyper-commercialism the actual holiday provides, one is easily left hollow and bitter.
I wonder--sometimes sitting in the bath, sometimes on a train staring at a teenager staring at me--whether Alceste ever found his little piece of nowhere to rule over justly, to uphold his high moral standards. I wonder if he's happy now--or was--if he's content musing to himself about how ethical he is. Does he ever come back for a brief visit to remind us all just how vile we are?
4 Comments:
Extreme release from hyper
-commercialism: A single friend of mine ended up having popcorns and an apple as Christmas dinner because she forgot to stock up her kitchen and not one place was open for her to get some hot food.
Thanks for your answers and wish you a very happy new year!
Wow, I can't believe you just blogged one of my favorite works ever. And I'm happy to see that you shared misanthropic thoughts similar to my own during the holidays. I think mine may win in the darkness category. But then again, you are a Christian, so you at least believe in some things that the holiday stands for, I guess.
Now, some comments:
1. The Misanthrope doesn't "just end." Alceste's best friend, Philinte, goes after him to stop him from secluding himself in the desert. I'm always left wondering whether Philinte was finally able to convince Alceste to adopt the kind of split existence to which he personally adheres between the public space of the court and its artificial and hypercommercial nature, and the private space of honesty and perfect friendship. But I also kind of think Philinte is a douchebag, and hope that Alceste bitch slapped him instead of listening to him.
2. Moliere suggests that the tragedy of Alceste as a character is his desire to lead his entire life according to an abstract philosophical idea. You may refuse to believe that characters are billboards for particular philosophical positions, but, at least in my understanding of the play, that is particularly what Moliere is critiquing in his characterization of Alceste. He demonstrates the absurdity of such a move.
3. God, now I'm picturing you sitting in a bath on a train staring at some poor teenager. I think I'm gonna go throw up.
Oh, and I'll get back to you about the trip to Japan soon--I have to see about a few things, but I think late April/early May is a go!
Liansu: the same was true here at New Year's. For four days not a single grocery store was open in this little pisser town which meant our only sources of food were the conbini or going to Toyohashi.
Sharon: The problem I have with Alceste being representative of anything is the fact that in the play he is not perfectly rigid. Philinte manages to convince him a couple of times of tempering his desire to flee and when dealing Celimene at the end, he's willing to (misguidedly) forgive her, but she's a shallow bitch, so obviously that doesn't work out.
I think that Alceste is representative of something, even if it is something that he doesn't intend. He's not representative of his own philosophy, but what his philosophy looks like in a concrete situation. Call it what theory looks like in practice, or the fact that abstract ideals can't be adhered to in reality. He isn't rigid, but he thinks somehow he can be, which any reader sees as completely ridiculous.
Post a Comment
<< Home